Remember that both of these chapters are meant to inform. For example, with the qualitative data you might be concerned about length.
Highlight all such aspects and make them a part of your discussion. It'll also make sure you do not go wildly off topic. Previous reports of smooth tonotopic maps may have resulted from techniques that average the responses over multiple neurons. Focus on the findings and discussion of your results and make sure that you explain how important they are to your study.
Avoid Over interpretation This is a major no-no when writing a dissertation discussion. What you set out to do purpose of researchwhat you did methods and what you found out main results.
Well, your findings chapter is sort of like a really lame movie script.
Within each of your subsections, you are going to have themes or headings that represent impactful talking points that you want to focus on. Therefore, at the end of your discussion introduction you should highlight the content that each of the subsections will cover.
Results can take the form of data, hypotheses, models, definitions, formulas, etc. Pretend your results are produced by a machine then describe the machine.
We also assume that you have used some sort of software program to help you with the organisation of your findings. The first is scholarly confidence. While a spider diagram encourages you to see connections, a matrix forces you to think about hierarchy.
This Discussion chapter thesis write a stylistic choice — there is no right or wrong way to do it, but the diagram lets you imagine different results and discuss the implications of the various choices. So by structuring a dissertation that lays out each research question for the marker, you are making their job easier.
At first, these data seem difficult to reconcile with numerous studies showing smooth, large-scale tonotopic organization in A1 for example, see A1 tonotopy in ferrets19, mice8, rats18 and monkeys Despite the heterogeneous organization with regard to signal correlation, neurons tended to have similar noise correlation during on-going and tone-driven activities, suggesting that noise correlations reflect structure in the local network see below.
One way is by referring the reader back to previous chapters, sections, or subsections. What parts would it need? These parts usually appear in the discussion and ask you to employ your critical thinking skills to demonstrate how your research fits into the bigger picture.
You need to keep in mind that the IMRAD structure is best used to write up empirical research work the type where you collect data of some kind.
The statements that you present and the tone that you use should be clear and crisp so that the readers do not have to read again and again what you mean.
Marking a dissertation usually requires the marker to comment on the extent to which the research questions have been addressed.
This clearly indicates to the reader how you have addressed your study. State the major conclusions from your study and present the theoretical and practical implications of your study.
And yet, there Discussion chapter thesis write seem to be a general confusion about what critical thinking entails, i. Doing so will adversely impact your discussion. That noted, there are different expectations for an undergraduate dissertation and a PhD thesis, so knowing what these expectations are can be really helpful before you begin.
Speculation should be reasonable, firmly justified, and subject to test. Presentation of quantitative data Presentation of quantitative data can be equally as challenging as the presentation of qualitative data, but for very different reasons.
By this point, the reader has gone through your findings and is now looking for your interpretation. A number of our findings support such a subnetworks model. For you, they will: Relate your findings to the issues you raised in the introduction.
You might be better off structuring your findings chapter in relation to your research questions or your hypotheses. However, there is one thing that you should keep in mind when mentioning about the results. Every name and year in the body of the text should be repeated in the list of references with no exceptions.
Although our data seems to best fit the overlapping subnetworks model, it is only one interpretation of our results. To help you create a flawless dissertation discussion, here are aspects that you should include and some factors that you should avoid:General conclusions and discussion Introduction In this chapter, the main findings with regard to the research questions are summarised and general conclusions based on the findings of the studies presented in this thesis are described.
Furthermore, the strengths and limitations. The findings chapter is likely to comprise the majority of your paper. It can be up to 40% of the total word count within your dissertation joeshammas.com is a huge chunk of information, so it's essential that it is clearly organised and that the reader knows what is supposed to be happening.
When writing a PhD thesis, the goal of your discussion chapter is to critically examine your findings and make judgements about what you have learned.
You are going to tell your readers what your findings may mean, how they are valuable, and why. In a conventional thesis, what we call the IMRAD type (introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion) the discussion chapter appears a discrete chapter.
Before you worry about the discussion chapter too much, consider whether you need to treat the discussion as a separate section at all. Indeed, every discussion should include a "humility" section that addresses the study's limitations, write Cone and Foster.
But avoid beginning the discussion with a. “Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (January ): ; Kretchmer, Paul.
Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. San Francisco Edit, Structure and Writing Style Don't Write Two Results Sections!Download